Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Revolut APP fraud litigation: High Court limits receiving-bank duties, permits unjust enrichment claim to trial, and foreshadows the UK’s October 2024 mandatory reimbursement regime

Published on: 29 August 2024

Published by a Law360 reporter
Legal News
imgtext
Article summary

Accordingly, the steady flow of APP fraud disputes reaching the courts is unlikely to abate in the near future. Against that wider backdrop, and with the arrival of the long-awaited mandatory reimbursement requirements, might the judicial handling and treatment of APP fraud claims settle into greater consistency? In Larsson v Revolut Ltd [2024] EWHC 1287 (CH), the claimant—an APP fraud victim—then brought civil proceedings against Revolut, an electronic money institution. They asserted that fraudsters duped them into transferring funds to five Revolut accounts, which the fraudsters had said were opened in the claimant’s own name at the time. Thereafter, believing, mistakenly, that they were buying shares in a company, the claimant sent money to those accounts. The accounts were not, however, in fact, in the claimant’s name, and the funds were rapidly moved on by the fraudsters. The claimant contended that Revolut should ultimately bear responsibility for the resultant financial loss. It was further alleged that Revolut had breached its contract with the claimant as well. Specifically, the claimant said Revolut failed to exercise reasonable skill and care by not adequately detecting, mitigating, or otherwise preventing the fraud...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow