Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

US D.C. Circuit clarifies FSIA immunity and arbitrability in ISDS enforcement: forum non conveniens rejected; merits vs jurisdiction under New York Convention; Deutsche Telekom v India remanded

Published on: 28 October 2025

Published by a LexisNexis Arbitration expert
Legal News
imgtext
Article summary

Deutsche Telekom, A.G., Appellee v Republic of India, Appellant No 24-7081 What are the practical implications of this case?

This ruling tackles complex questions in international arbitration, namely jurisdiction, arbitrability, and how far sovereign immunity extends under the FSIA. As the D.C. Circuit observed, these matters are also before the US Supreme Court via a petition for certiorari in Kingdom of Spain v Blasket Renewables Investments LLC, No. 24-1130 (US, 1 May 2025), with an amicus curiae submission backing it from the European Commission and multiple European states. On sovereign immunity, the FSIA carves out an exception for recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards under section 1605(a)(6). While states often plead immunity in US actions to confirm arbitral awards, courts increasingly reject those arguments by relying on this FSIA exception. Even so, US courts have treated immunity-based contentions both as merits defences and as jurisdictional challenges. Existing authority indicates that whether an arbitration agreement exists is a question courts may examine as a jurisdictional matter, but the breadth of such agreements falls outside judicial review...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow