Legal Q&A

Clare Ambrose, Twenty Essex The party’s representative should liaise with the witness and the other side. It should seldom be impossible to resolve matters by arranging for evidence to be given remotely. Such an approach is fairly standard practice......

Interest on judgment debts Judgment debts accrue simple interest at 8% per annum until paid, unless the court decides otherwise. By default, interest runs from the date judgment is given, unless the court, a rule or a Practice Direction provides differently. The court may order interest to run from a date before judgment. For further guidance, see Practice Note: Interest on judgment debts, together with the following Practice Notes: County Court judgments and orders—additional matters Which enforcement of judgment method should I choose?—in particular, the section: Which enforcement of judgment method should I choose?— In which court should you enforce your judgment—practical considerations Transferring a judgment from the High Court to a Country Court CPR 70.3 makes provision for transfer of proceedings in question, and states that an application must be made to the High Court before an order permitting the transfer of the...

General principles—privilege and confidentiality One of the trickier problems a practitioner encounters during litigation, especially at the disclosure stage of proceedings, is protecting a client’s confidential documents and information from review by other parties and from being put before the court. A principal way to secure protection for material relevant to a dispute is to assert that it is privileged. Once it is established that a document is privileged, the holder acquires a right to refuse inspection of that document. For wider guidance on the meaning and effects of privilege, see Practice Note: Privilege—general principles. Crucially, merely labelling a document ‘privileged’ does not settle its status. To benefit from this special protection—allowing a client to maintain confidentiality and withhold inspection of a relevant document—the criteria for one of the recognised forms of privilege must actually be satisfied (see below). More generally, for a claim to...

Money Claim Online is available for issuing claims for a defined monetary amount below £100,000, excluding interest and costs. The approach to costs mirrors that applied to any other claim brought under CPR Part 7. The fixed costs regime A claim falls within the fixed costs regime where no acknowledgement of service or defence is lodged, or where the defendant admits the claim. In that situation, the claimant may seek judgment through Money Claim Online by submitting the online request form. Once judgment is entered, the claimant’s legal representative is entitled to the fixed costs under CPR 45.4, as listed in Table 2 of CPR 45, which, for a claim over £5,000, range from £30 to £70 depending on the circumstances in which judgment is obtained......

The Land Registration Act 2002 ( LRA 2002) introduced a new framework for the law of adverse possession in relation to registered land, as provided by LRA 2002, Sch 6. The revised regime offers greater protection for landowners whenever a claim for adverse possession of land is brought. Simply having adverse possession for a period exceeding twelve years no longer means the land will have been acquired by the adverse possessor. Rather, following a continuous period of ten years’ adverse possession, the squatter may apply to be registered as proprietor of that land under the scheme, as set out therein......

Background Part 20 exists to ensure counterclaims and other additional claims are handled in the most practical and efficient way ( CPR 20). Claim The route for any counterclaim varies according to whether proceedings are under Part 7 or Part 8. A probate claim must be started under the Part 7 procedure ( CPR 57.3(b)). For Part 57 purposes, a ‘probate claim’ covers an application for a decree affirming or denying the validity of a purported will ( CPR 57.1(2)(a)(iii)). Counterclaim Where a defendant maintains that they have any claim concerning the grant of probate of the deceased person’s Will, they must advance that position by serving a counterclaim ( CPR 57.8(1))......

Changes to CPR PD 22 took effect on 6 April 2020. The revisions modified the mandated wording for the statement of truth that authenticates documents to be deployed in civil proceedings. Nevertheless, under both the old and new versions the signatory must still confirm their belief that the 'contents' of the pertinent documents are true—or, under the updated formula, that the 'facts stated' in the relevant document are true......

CPR 31.10 contains provisions for the disclosure of documents by way of a list. Obligations to disclose continue until the case is concluded. If additional documents are discovered after a list has been served, a supplementary list must be provided ( CPR PD 31A, para 3.3). For broader guidance on disclosure, see Practice Notes: Disclosure under CPR 31—introduction and Disclosure—standard disclosure and the reasonable search. When issuing directions, the court will fix the deadline by which the list must be served on the other party. CPR 31.21: a party cannot rely on a document it has not disclosed unless the court grants permission. CPR 32.10 (witness statements) and CPR 35.13 (experts’ reports) are framed so that, upon default, court permission is required to adduce or rely on that evidence. This points to an application for permission, rather than an...

An unincorporated association is not a legal entity In principle, it lacks legal personality and therefore cannot bring or face proceedings in its own name; this was the stance in London Association for Protection of Trade v Greenlands Limited. The position was examined in detail in Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v Broughton, a matter arising from a campaign by the Animal Liberation Front and related bodies. The conventional course is to seek a representation order, allowing a named member or office-holder to be joined as a party ‘on behalf of the members of the association’. Yet time pressures—particularly an approaching limitation deadline—may make obtaining such an order impracticable, prompting a prospective claimant to ask whether the association can be joined in its own name. As recorded in University of Oxford, there have been instances where the court has in fact made orders...

What is a DCFA? Most practitioners know the ‘pure’ CFA, commonly referred to as a ‘no win, no fee’ agreement. Working under a pure CFA, the lawyer or legal representative is remunerated only upon a win, as the CFA expressly defines it. If that outcome is not achieved, no fee is payable for the professional work undertaken on the matter. For additional detail, see the subtopic: CFAs and DBAs for further information. A DCFA is often described as a ‘no win, lower fee’ arrangement in contrast to the pure CFA. Under a DCFA, the client agrees to meet the lawyer’s fees in full on success; if the case fails, a reduced fee is payable to the representative. The role of success fees Success fees exist to ensure a solicitor’s portfolio of CFA-backed litigation can operate at nil net loss overall. Put...

The nature of joint and several liability As outlined in the Practice Note on joint, several, and joint and several liability, joint and several liability arises when two or more parties to the same contract give a promise to the same person, while, at the same time, each of them separately makes that identical promise to that same person, within the same contractual arrangement......

Clare Ambrose, Twenty Essex The clear benefit is that the hearing can proceed and the dispute be determined, which is the tribunal’s fundamental objective. The tribunal’s obligation to be fair to both sides does not compel an in-person hearing; if suitable arrangements permit the hearing to happen, that will be a weighty factor in favour. There is also a possible gain in cost efficiency: although premium technology may incur expense, savings on hearing venues and travel and hotel accommodation could be substantial. Virtual hearings remain relatively novel, so practice is evolving to manage practicalities and logistics across the board. The range of technological solutions is broad and warrants careful review and thorough investigation by the parties involved. For the hearing to run smoothly, every participant in the arbitration should trial their equipment in the precise location from which their virtual hearing will (for each of them) be...

Both sides must record their agreement or dispute within a costs budget discussion report ( Costs Precedent R)...

Retention Retention describes the portion of interim payments the employer withholds as security for the contractor’s future performance of its duties and to encourage the contractor to discharge those duties in full and properly. For further details, consult the Practice Note: Retention of payment in construction contracts. When retention is to be released to the contractor depends on the particular contract terms for the project. Typically, half of the retained sum is paid out at practical completion, with the balance thereafter following completion of any remedial works for defects reported within the defects liability period. Consequently, if these milestones are reached before the final certificate is issued, the contractor may have a right to seek payment of some or all of the retention......

Pre- Action Protocol for Debt Claims The Pre- Action Protocol for Debt Claims (the Protocol) took effect on 1 October 2017. When the Protocol applies, the court expects parties to adhere to its requirements before issuing a claim, and will factor in any failure when setting directions for the conduct of any later proceedings (see paragraph 7 of the Protocol). There are no transitional arrangements within the Protocol. Refer to: Precedent: Letter of claim—contractual debt claim—in compliance with the Pre- Action Protocol for Debt Claims; and Practice Notes: The pre-action protocols and when they apply, and Debt claims and pre-action conduct......

We have been unable to locate any case law on the exact matter raised in your query at this time. Nevertheless, please kindly consider the following further details, which you may find helpful. When the Pre- Action Protocol for Debt Claims (the Protocol) applies The Pre- Action Protocol for Debt Claims (effective from 1 October 2017) is engaged when a business—such as a sole trader or public body—seeks recovery of a debt from an individual, including a sole trader. It is inapplicable to business-to-business debts except where the debtor is a sole trader ( Pre- Action Protocol for Debt Claims, para 1.1)......

In this Q& A, we assume that B’s claim is smaller than A’s. Legal process against the company Under paragraph 43(2) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 ( IA 1986), the moratorium prevents any legal process—covering legal proceedings, execution, distress and diligence—from being started or continued against the company or its property without the administrator’s consent or the court’s permission. This wording is wide enough to encompass any remaining actions or steps that might otherwise be taken against the company or its property. Accordingly, B can only bring an action against A with the approval of the administrator or the leave of the court. The purpose of the moratorium (and the interim moratorium) is to safeguard the company and its assets from creditor action during the company’s administration and the pre-appointment period. It bars any steps, actions or processes from being begun or carried on...

Limitation issues when enforcing a judgment Under Section 24(1) of the Limitation Act 1980, proceedings to rely upon any judgment cannot be commenced after the expiry of six years calculated from the date on which that judgment initially became enforceable for enforcement purposes......

Court fees in civil proceedings We direct you to our Lexis+® UK Dispute Resolution Practice Note: Court fees in civil proceedings, which sets out details of court fees payable for all aspects of civil proceedings......

In numerous matters, one or both sides in a legal dispute appear without lawyers, representing themselves in the proceedings. This occurs for a range of reasons; frequently, the cause is an inability to obtain legal representation because of limited personal finances. Every section of the legal profession, under its respective code of conduct and in line with its duties to the court, is obliged to treat litigants in person with fairness and respect. In addition, the Judicial College Guidance offers further direction to the judiciary on the role of the judge when a case features a litigant in person within proceedings of this kind......