Legal News

Stay up to date with the legal news that matters, curated by our experts
GET A TRIAL

Featured documents

IP

Lucasfilm did not benefit in any way at Tyburn Film Productions Ltd's expense, counsel said to the appeals court there on 3 December 2025, in part because it already possessed rights over Cushing's likeness and an agreement and consent from the Cushing estate to 'resurrect' him as Grand Moff Tarkin. Tyburn contends it earlier made an agreement with the late actor then, at the time, granting the company a veto over any use of his image prior to his 1994 death. That contract concerns a TV series titled 'Heritage of Horror', which never aired. Tyburn further asserts the deal permits it to effectively 'resurrect' Cushing using stand-ins and CGI to ultimately finish the programme then if the actor were to die whilst filming remained in progress...

Read More Right Arrow
IRELAND - COMMERCIAL

Irish telecom operator Eircom’s damages lawsuit against BT Group over a public-sector contract must be carefully managed to trial to deal with confidentiality issues and other matters, a UK judge told the parties today. At the High Court in London today, a judge said Eircom’s damages action against BT over a public-sector contract needs tight case management through to trial to address confidentiality and related concerns. Eircom brought the claim after Ofcom in 2020 penalised BT for its behaviour during a tender. Speaking to both sides, Judge Adam Johnson urged them to resolve any confidentiality flashpoints themselves and signalled he had no wish to step in unless it became unavoidable. He also expressed confidence that parties would do everything possible to keep confidential designations to a minimum, noting this was necessary to maintain control over the conduct of the trial. He framed this as the

Read More Right Arrow
INTERNATIONAL TRADE

The following document is attached: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/274 dated 5 February 2026, revising Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1981, establishing a final anti-dumping levy on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware produced in...

Read More Right Arrow
IP

Justice Richard Arnold granted AstraZeneca leave to appeal and permitted lorries carrying about 175,000 packs of Glenmark’s generics to move on to wholesalers, provided they did not reach pharmacy shelves while the case continued at any point during those interim proceedings. In this way, Glenmark could keep its first-to-market advantage, while causing only minimal detriment to AstraZeneca should the Court of Appeal later be persuaded to issue an injunction against supply. The judge said this approach maintained the status quo with the least possible prejudice to Glenmark’s position overall. The hearing was arranged at short notice, just days after the High Court refused AstraZeneca an injunction to block the diabetes generic from sale while the court considered whether the patents supporting the branded medicine were valid in law. Glenmark, Generics (UK) Ltd and Teva Pharmaceuticals have each begun proceedings in the UK to set...

Read More Right Arrow

Most recent News

Clear all filter
NEWS

Lorenz v Caruana and others [2025] EWCA Civ 606 What are the practical implications of this case? The ruling underscores that claims premised on obligations said to arise from spoken discussions will seldom be apt for summary judgment. Here, the supposed duty took the form of a secret trust; nonetheless, the reasoning equally touches claims of purported oral contracts more broadly. It serves as a prompt to advisers that, where a case turns mainly on witness accounts, save in exceptional instances the court will be unable to resolve factual disputes ahead of trial. A bid for summary judgment is therefore unlikely to prosper unless the material refuting the existence of any oral bargain is compelling in the extreme, or the asserted obligation conflicts with a settled legal principle, on both the facts and the law advanced. What was the...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

The UPC’s Munich LD in a recent ruling granted global agrichemical group Syngenta's request to include non- UPC territories in its infringement claim in light of the Court of Justice’s decision on jurisdiction in BSH v Electrolux . In a recent order, the UPC’s Munich local division permitted global agrichemical group Syngenta to broaden its infringement action to encompass non‑ UPC territories, taking its cue from the Court of Justice’s jurisdiction ruling in BSH v Electrolux. In Syngenta v Sumi Agro, the Munich LD aligned with the UPC Court of Appeal’s approach in TGI Sport v AIM Sport, concluding that the amendment could not realistically have been made earlier. As a result, post‑ Electrolux bids to extend claims to cover non‑ UPC states are likely to be frequent, at least in the near term, and the UPC will address them on a...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Standing Mechanism for the resolution of international investment disputes In September 2024, WG III examined how tribunal members should be selected and appointed. The discussions were intense and highly detailed, with political ramifications. Briefly, the outcome was: Qualifications and requirements: priority on professional expertise and high competence; experience across roles and functions (such as arbitrator, judge, mediator or counsel) to be assessed holistically to ensure diversity in Tribunal composition; experience managing international disputes was noted; experience working with governments, including through the judiciary or the foreign or civil service. Candidates and members would be subject to the Code of conduct for judges in international investment dispute resolution, requiring independence and impartiality......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

R ( Grantchester Parish Council) v Greater Cambridge Partnership [2025] EWHC 923 ( Admin) What are the practical implications of this case? This was a highly atypical judicial review, because five witnesses gave oral testimony to resolve the single disputed issue of whether, in the terms alleged by the claimant, a local councillor made an oral commitment at an informal meeting. As might be expected, differing recollections across the witnesses meant the oral evidence was ultimately inconclusive. The court applied the practical guidance in Gestmin v Credit Suisse [2013] EWHC 3560 ( Comm)—guidance more often seen in commercial litigation—namely that a judge should place little, if any, reliance on what witnesses recall being said in meetings and conversations, and should instead anchor factual findings in contemporaneous documents and in known or probable facts. Accordingly, the court preferred the documentary record and the inherent...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Court of Appeal upholds competition tribunal findings The Court of Appeal has confirmed the competition tribunal’s conclusions, effectively excising part of the investors’ case against Binance and several other crypto‑exchanges over their moves to halt trading in Bitcoin Satoshi Vision ( BSV). Created by Australian computer scientist Craig Wright, who falsely asserted he was Satoshi Nakamoto, BSV was delisted in 2019. Roughly 75,000 holders maintained that removing the coin’s listing throttled its development and prospects. They argued for around £8.99bn in damages for a ‘loss of chance’ that BSV would become a top‑tier cryptocurrency, potentially rivalling bitcoin’s value, had trading continued across exchanges. However, the appellate court endorsed the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s rejection of that thesis, finding that compensation should not be paid for the mere possibility that BSV’s price might have rocketed in a market as ‘volatile’ as...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

The Czech Republic v Diag Human SE [2025] EWCA Civ 588 What are the practical implications of this case? For those engaged in investment treaty arbitrations, this ruling is noteworthy for the Court of Appeal’s treatment of investment treaty jurisprudence on what it means to qualify as an ‘investor’ under BITs. The Court of Appeal determined that a legal entity which, on its own, did not satisfy the definition of ‘investor’ must be subject to de jure control—rather than merely de facto control—by a qualifying investor (here, an individual) to attain investor status. The judgment also provides helpful guidance on the reach and consequences of Articles 23 and 32 of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law ( UNCITRAL) Rules, addressing Pleas as to the jurisdiction of the tribunal and Waiver of the right to object. More broadly, the decision will interest...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Mergers The Commission approved the deal by H. I. G. Europe Middle Market Holdings, L. P., securing exclusive control over TIMETOACT Holding Gmb H......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Jusan Technologies Ltd v Uconinvest Llc [2025] EWHC 704 ( Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? The key takeaways are: Companies and shareholders should think carefully about the mechanism for future share transfers when negotiating a shareholders' agreement. In this matter, the stipulation for a deed of adherence signed by the company and every shareholder created notable and unnecessary obstacles Share purchasers ought to carry out thorough due diligence to identify any terms in the articles of association or shareholders' agreements that might later hinder the transfer and registration of shares CA 2006, s 40 is designed to be wide-ranging, yet it still leaves certain constraints on the directors' authority to bind the company What was the background? JTL applied under CA 2006, s 125(1) for rectification of its register of members by removing the name of Uconivest LLC (...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Antitrust CMA accepts Vifor’s commitments to end CMA’s abuse probe into disparaging treatment in iron treatment market The CMA has confirmed it will accept commitments from Vifor Pharma ( Vifor) to address concerns that it abused a dominant position by issuing misleading claims about a competing intravenous iron treatment. By way of context, on 31 January 2024, the CMA opened an investigation into whether Vifor—the company behind the intravenous iron deficiency medicine Ferinject—had curtailed competition by circulating misinformation to healthcare professionals about the safety of a rival product, Monofer, supplied by Pharmacosmosa, a family-owned specialist pharmaceutical company. To resolve the CMA’s competition concerns, Vifor has undertaken to: make a voluntary payment of £23m to the NHS rectify any potentially misleading communications issued by Vifor Pharma regarding the safety of Monofer and Ferinject through a multi-channel communications campaign directed at healthcare...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Home Office plans to prohibit public-sector organisations from paying ransoms, and to require other entities to consult with the authorities before contemplating any transfer to their attackers, are designed to undercut the prevailing ransomware business model by making the UK a far less lucrative destination. Yet lawyers also warn the measures, set out in a wide‑ranging government consultation, may underestimate their opponents. Julian Hayes, a partner at BCL Solicitors LLP, described the idea as “deceptively simple and unquestionably well‑intentioned”, but said it verges on the naive. He added that, even if it succeeded, it would simply divert ransomware operators towards softer targets. According to the Home Office, ransomware drew in more than £1bn from victims worldwide in 2023. It has become a profitable stream of cash for cybercriminals and state‑sponsored actors able to penetrate businesses and public agencies and seize control of their...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

The Department for Work and Pensions stated the proposals would 'boost investment' while delivering advantages for pension scheme members. Specifics of the overhaul remain uncertain; however, ministers confirmed that a formal reply to consultations will appear in the coming weeks, with initial draft provisions set to feature in the next Pension Schemes Bill. Torsten Bell, the Pensions Minister, argued that expanding surpluses in pension funds can be put to productive use. ' At present, certain trustees are prevented from passing on the value of a surplus, but our approach will enable every scheme to do this safely, thereby unlocking higher levels of investment across......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

after the Irish privacy regulator said today the social media company has introduced ‘significant’ steps to uphold users’ own personal data rights when training its AI system with public Instagram and Facebook content. The Irish Data Protection Commission said Meta has been ‘responsive’ to its requests to carry out its recommendations concerning the potential impact on individuals’ data protection rights when teaching its AI model with public posts from adults. Meta first unveiled its plans to commence training of a Large Language Model in March 2024. The company halted the plans after the Irish watchdog highlighted several privacy shortcomings. AI systems, especially Large Language Models, are often trained with vast amounts of data gathered on the open internet without much separation between personal and non-personal data. Pressure groups, such......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Mergers The Commission approved: the securing of joint control over Kee Safety Group by Inflexion Private Equity Partners LLP and 65 Equity Partners Pte. Ltd ( M.11983) following a phase I investigation—for further details, see Midday Express the attainment of joint control of Grand Bahamas Shipyard Ltd......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

What are the practical implications of this case? The National Farmers’ Union v Herefordshire Council and another [2025] EWHC 536 ( Admin) has consequences for how agricultural projects that produce manure are regulated. It is especially relevant to the oversight of large livestock operations, including intensive poultry units. The ruling makes it less likely that agricultural manure will be treated as outside waste-related controls and obligations. In practical terms, promoters of new livestock units in Herefordshire may now be expected to prepare waste management method statements. The decision also matters for those seeking to devise, challenge, or defend planning policies that address issues such as the handling of agricultural waste. On the facts, the court concluded it was not necessary to confine the scope of the local plan to the definition of waste contained within the Planning Acts......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Full statement below: 21st May 2025 Across the last two years, the DPC has worked closely and intensively with numerous leading technology firms driving AI innovation, particularly around how adults’ personal data is used to train Large Language Models within the EU/ EEA. We recognise that applying the General Data Protection Regulation ( GDPR) to this rapidly evolving field is intricate; nevertheless, via our supervisory engagement the DPC has clarified for companies exactly what is expected in order to mitigate significant risks and potential harms to individuals. As a result of this engagement, several companies have introduced enhancements and extra data protection safeguards ahead of launching in the EU. In March 2024, Meta notified the DPC of its intention to train its Large Language Model on public content posted by adults on Facebook and Instagram throughout the EU/ EEA. Following engagement with Meta and a...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Background to NISTA’s formation Bringing the NIC and IPA together tackles the entrenched gap between high-level planning and on-the-ground delivery that has long hindered major infrastructure schemes. This move is backed by strong evidence: the Construction Leadership Council reviewed 20,000 schemes and found that thorough front-end planning cut costs markedly and sped up completion. The NIC’s 2024 report also singled out the split between strategy and execution as a key cause of rising UK infrastructure costs. By merging, government intends to streamline infrastructure development, trim red tape, and strengthen coordination across all facets of delivery. NISTA’s role and potential impact NISTA’s brief goes well beyond tidying up structures. It will act as the focal point for both strategy and delivery, from shaping the ten-year infrastructure plan to advising on private finance and delivery practice. In priority places like the Oxford– Cambridge Growth Corridor, NISTA will plan in the...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Full statement below: Commission calls on 19 Member States to fully transpose the NIS2 Directive. Today, the European Commission resolved to issue a reasoned opinion to 19 Member States ( Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Spain, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Hungary, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Finland and Sweden) for not notifying full transposition of the NIS2 Directive......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Re Madagascar Oil Ltd [2025] EWHC 1015 ( Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This judgment marks the first reported approval of an English restructuring plan that splits two creditors into separate classes, establishing a benchmark for using the fewest possible classes to ring-fence objecting creditors. Businesses can be more confident about placing creditors into tailored classes even where they would share the same insolvency ranking, provided the plan delivers materially different outcomes for them. The ruling endorses recognition of divergent creditor interests where it is not feasible for those creditors to confer with a view to their common interest... What was the background? Madagascar Oil Ltd ( MOL) is a Mauritian-incorporated company with its head office in the UK. It forms part of a group that includes its operating subsidiary, Madagascar Oil SA ( MOSA), and its parent, BMK Resources Ltd ( BMK). The group...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

A three-judge panel of the state appellate court, in an opinion authored by Justice Le Roy K Martin Jr, held that the lower court correctly determined that Abb Vie shares issued to Allergan shareholders were exempt from registration, among other determinations. The ruling records that Abb Vie completed its acquisition of Allergan in 2020, with Allergan holders receiving cash and new Abb Vie shares in exchange for their former Allergan stock. When unveiling the deal, Abb Vie stated it would rely on section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, a provision that dispenses with registration where securities are swapped for other securities and, after a hearing, a court or governmental body regards the exchange terms as fair. The required ‘fairness hearing’ was held in May 2020 before the High Court in Dublin, Ireland, and the merger was approved after the court found: the merger was fair and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

LCP stated that HSBC, Nat West, BP the oil giant, Barclays and Lloyds Banking Group together held over £20bn of the FTSE100’s £40bn pension scheme surplus at the end of December 2024. The average surplus for firms with a UK defined benefit pension plan on that index is £600m, the consultancy added. Funding surpluses in defined benefit arrangements have surged—a stance LCP says is set to endure. The adviser also noted there has been an overall surplus across the UK’s top 100 companies for five consecutive years, and that 80% of that cohort with a defined benefit pension workplace savings scheme reported a surplus at their 2024 balance according to LCP at year-end 2024......

Read More Right Arrow

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow

Discover more from LexisNexis