R (Greyhound Board of Great Britain Ltd) v Welsh Ministers [2026] EWHC 670 (Admin) What are the practical implications of this case? The ruling reinforces the constitutional divide between the courts and the legislature. It explains that the scheme and framework of the Government of Wales Act 2006 (GWA 2006) embody that separation of powers, and that any judicial attempt to recognise and enforce a common law obligation on Welsh Ministers to consult prior to introducing legislation in the Senedd would trespass upon that boundary. This is not a departure from established principle; case law has already upheld comparable rules for lawmakers in Scotland and at Westminster. However, this is the first express confirmation of the position for Welsh lawmakers, and the first time this dimension of the GWA 2006 has been analysed in such depth. The court examined earlier
The solution arrived through the United Nations Compensation Commission (UNCC), a quasi‑judicial body handling mass claims, created under UN Security Council Resolution 687. By addressing environmental harm—most notably via its ‘F4’ claim class—the UNCC set a seminal benchmark shaping how international law and contemporary arbitral panels allocate financial responsibility for wartime ecological devastation. With present-day wars in areas such as Eastern Europe and the Middle East bringing dam breaches, strikes on chemical facilities, and the burning of farmland, the UNCC’s legacy endures as an essential reference point for states, global investors, and companies engaged in post‑conflict arbitration. The F4 claims: Quantifying the unquantifiable Prior to the 1990s, mechanisms in international law for war reparations overwhelmingly favoured property loss, foregone earnings, and bodily injury. The natural world was commonly treated as a mute, non-compensable victim of armed hostilities...
Understanding the farming business as a business Many farms still use long-standing structures that arose by habit, not strategy. Sole traders, informal partnerships and outdated partnership deeds are common. While once effective, such setups can cause major issues around succession, tax planning and involving the next generation. A corporate team can take a fresh, business-led view of the farm, asking: Who owns the land and other critical assets? Who manages daily operations? Who carries the risk and who enjoys the return? What is the enduring plan for succession? From this review, the team can confirm whether the current setup is fit for purpose or if an alternative — for example an updated partnership agreement, a company, a limited liability partnership, or a blended model — would better meet the family’s aims. Tax efficiency through joined-up advice Tax sits at the centre of most
See the Q& A: Does a lasting power of attorney ( LPA) allow the attorney to exercise settlor powers reserved to a donor who has lost capacity? Powers of an attorney The issue concerns a property and affairs lasting power of attorney under section 9(1)(b) of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 ( MCA 2005). With this form of LPA, the attorney may make any decision or take any step the donor could have taken about their property and affairs. Under section 9(4) MCA 2005, the authority given by an LPA is subject to: the provisions of the MCA 2005, notably section 1 (the principles) and section 4 (the duty to act in the donor’s best interests); and any conditions or restrictions specified in the instrument itself. The donor may expressly narrow or expand the attorney’s powers......
Metatron DOO v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 115 ( TC) The appellant, a company established and registered for VAT in Slovenia, challenged HMRC decisions refusing repayment of amounts it says were wrongly charged by UK suppliers. Those amounts arose when it purchased goods from UK suppliers via the e Bay platform. The appellant explained it had asked the suppliers to apply the zero rate of VAT to the goods, but that request was declined. HMRC applied to have the appeals struck out on the basis that, under rule 8(2) of The Tribunal Procedure ( First-tier Tribunal) ( Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, SI 2009/273, the FTT had no jurisdiction to consider HMRC’s refusal to provide a refund in such circumstances, and, under rule 8(3), there was no reasonable prospect of the appeals succeeding. The purchases in question were made through e Bay from UK sellers and, the...
Indeed, gathering and examining business data have long formed a core part of the government’s investigative and prosecutorial toolkit in practice. Moreover, with the surge in analysis-ready datasets in recent years, collection technologies have multiplied rapidly and grown markedly more advanced. Notably, across the last 25 years the government has escalated its use of data analytics to spot and probe suspected criminal or civil fraud offences, and thereafter to bring prosecutions. Accordingly, the 29 November 2023 announcement by US Department of Justice ( DOJ) policymakers that, for the first time, they are harnessing data analytics to proactively detect and pursue offences in foreign corruption matters was a logical evolution of investigative practice. History of data analytics in federal criminal and civil fraud enforcement The government has relied on data collection and data analysis for many years to investigate and prosecute crime as well. As early as 1914,...
Hemming v Poulton [2023] EWHC 3001 ( KB) What are the practical implications of this case? Of particular interest is the discussion of when claimants may amend their claim to add further defamation causes that would otherwise be out of time. The ruling underscores how difficult this is—the essence of libel lies in publication, not the nature of the allegations. Claims concerning discrete publications, even if repeating the same or similar accusations, will rarely, if ever, arise from ‘the same or substantially the same facts’ already in issue. The decision likewise highlights the challenge of seeking to disapply the libel limitation period under section 32A of the Limitation Act 1980. What was the background? Factual background The case has a long and complex factual and procedural history. The claims ultimately stem from allegations that the claimant, the former MP for Birmingham Yardley, assaulted an...
Barnard v Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Authority [2024] EAT 12 What are the practical implications of this judgment? This decision confirms that a contractual obligation on employees to remain prepared for an operational post (eg by keeping fit and completing the required training) can amount to a genuine material factor, providing a defence to an equal pay claim. That point was, however, scarcely disputed. The contested question was the significance of evidence showing that the relevant comparators had not stayed wholly ready for such an operational role. The EAT stated that the central enquiry is whether the obligation is authentic rather than a ‘dead letter’—that is, whether it remains in force, and has not been abandoned or suspended—and whether it contributes to the pay gap. It ruled that if a comparator is no longer adhering to the...
Subsidy control The Subsidy Advice Unit has released its final report, setting out advice to the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero on its proposed Contracts for Difference for Renewables scheme (as at Allocation Round 6); see further, final report. Note— For all matters referred to the Subsidy Advice Unit under the Subsidy Control Act 2022, see the UK subsidy control—cases tracker. Upcoming dates: For dates of forthcoming UK competition developments, see the UK Competition calendar......
The firm collapsed in 2019 and, in November 2023, the UK’s financial regulator censured it after a probe found LCF had sold unregulated and misleading minibonds to investors. Last week, the Financial Conduct Authority issued a £31,800 penalty and barred a former LCF director for approving the company’s misleading financial promotions. Claimants — including joint administrators Finbarr O’ Connell, Adam Stephens, Colin Hardman and Lane Bednash of Evelyn Partners — have provided evidence indicating that LCF conducted business......
Gorbachev v Guriev [2024] EWHC 247 ( Comm) What are the practical implications of this case? This ruling carries real significance for what may become an increasingly common aspect of High Court litigation: applications for the trial judge to be appointed as a special examiner to take the evidence of witnesses overseas who are either unable to attend court to testify in person or who could face very serious consequences if they were to do so. The practical effect of the decision is most clearly and helpfully shown by comparison with another recent ruling of Mr Justice Andrew Baker in the SKAT Litigation. Read together, the decisions indicate that a court has two main options when a key witness cannot come to the jurisdiction to give trial evidence, or would face significant consequences if they tried (eg arrest). One route, preferred by Andrew Baker J in the...
Copyright owners are urging the EU’s new AI Office to act quickly so that Open AI’s Chat GPT, Dall- E and other general-purpose AI systems comply with EU copyright rules when they trawl the internet for vast quantities of material to train foundation models. The EU’s AI Act, the world’s first comprehensive AI law, sets out specific duties to ensure foundation models observe Directive ( EU) 2019/790, the Digital Single Market ( DSM) Copyright Directive. Right holders notched a win in December 2023, when EU negotiators agreed to impose obligations on foundation models to honour copyright. The European Commission’s 2021 draft had omitted such safeguards, arguing the DSM Copyright Directive already addressed them. Even so, Members of the European Parliament pressed to include these requirements, especially after Chat GPT’s surge in popularity following its November 2022 launch. Copyright protection has become a pivotal global...
Market studies CMA begins market study on infant formula market The CMA has confirmed it has begun a market study into the UK supply of infant and follow-on formula, following the release of its initial findings and a November 2023 commitment to examine this sector in far greater detail......
Laudamotion Gmb H v flightright Gmb H, Case C-474/22, ECLI- EU- C-2024-73 What are the practical implications of this case? In Laudamotion Gmb H v flightright Gmb H ( Case C-474/22; ECLI- EU- C-2024-73), the consequences for air passengers covered by Regulation ( EC) No 261/2004, the Air Passenger Rights Regulation (the ‘ Regulation’), are far-reaching. Air passengers often find themselves already informed that a flight will run three hours late. Such delays are routine within aviation and may stem from technical problems with the aeroplane, strikes, or any other cause. When, because of that known delay, an air passenger no longer wishes to travel—whether because they know they will miss their meeting, as occurred in the dispute, or for any other reason—it is perfectly ordinary for them not to go to the gate to check in; and, where the delay is flagged much sooner, not even to set...
CZQ v CZS [2023] SGHC( I) 16 What are the practical implications of this case? Staged dispute resolution clauses are now widespread, notably in sectors like construction and life sciences, and in other contracts premised on sustained collaboration between counterparties (for example, joint venture arrangements). It is natural for parties to prefer settling disagreements consensually, so far as practicable, before commencing formal arbitration, since once arbitral proceedings begin it is unlikely the wider contractual relationship can be preserved. That said, the Singapore courts have emphasised that although parties may, by contract, oblige attempts at amicable settlement (and other pre-arbitration mechanisms, such as mediation) before arbitration is started, the language must be explicit in conveying that intention. Drafters preparing multi-tier dispute resolution provisions governed by Singapore law, with Singapore as the arbitral seat, should note that any pre-arbitration steps will be treated as...
Mergers Orange/ Masmovil/ JV conditionally cleared after phase II The Commission has granted conditional approval for the planned creation of a joint set-up by Orange S. A. ( Orange) and Mas Movil ( Mas Movil) following a phase II review ( M.10896). In Spain, Orange and Mas Movil are respectively the second and fourth largest operators, active across both retail and wholesale channels for fixed broadband and mobile services. Spain counts four mobile network operators overall: Telefónica, Vodafone, Orange and Mas Movil. In parallel, multiple mobile and fixed virtual network operators depend on the infrastructure of these network operators to provide consumers with fixed and mobile telecoms services. The Commission raised concerns that the deal could curb competition in the retail markets for mobile and fixed internet services in Spain, whether these are supplied on a standalone basis or bundled...
The SRA was judged to offer 'sufficient' assurance against two benchmarks: 'well-led' and an 'effective approach to regulation'. The board has shifted to a traffic light system, grading regulators as delivering 'sufficient', 'partial' or 'insufficient' assurance. However, the LSB, the body supervising the regulation of lawyers in England and Wales, noted that its review spanned only October 2022 to May 2023. As a result, then, 'significant events for the sector' sat beyond the review window. The SRA's August 2023 intervention into Axiom Ince, together with the board's subsequent look at the steps preceding that move, are excluded. Nor did the LSB consider the possible extent of solicitors' involvement in the miscarriages of justice central to the Post Office scandal. The oversight regulator also gave no explanation for limiting the assessment to eight months rather than a full year during the period under...
What are the practical implications of this case? The ruling underlines that where a nuptial agreement was voluntarily made and its consequences were properly appreciated, one should think very carefully before seeking to attack it for want of financial disclosure and/or independent legal advice. It also confirms that, for arrangements offering minimal or no provision to the other spouse, the needs assessment is ‘needs light’, not ‘needs generously interpreted’. Had the husband taken up the wife’s open proposal, he would have secured a substantial lump sum instead of merely a life interest in a property. Parties should think twice before spurning a capital settlement where the post-nuptial agreement contains no plan for any such payment. Here, the parties’ litigation conduct was treated as supporting the ‘needs light’ stance and the award of a life interest. A cross-check, taking into account the £1.04m the husband owed the wife...
Lynch faces a California trial in March 2024 over alleged fraud linked to the US$11.7bn disposal of his software company, Autonomy, to Hewlett- Packard ( HP). The founder filed a lawsuit against the anti-corruption body on 31 January 2024, following its refusal to release all the personal data he had sought from its files, in full. An SFO spokesperson stated on 19 February 2024 that the SFO would provide certain materials, though not the entirety of them, confirming only partial disclosure. Lynch’s lawyers will assess the papers before determining whether to press ahead with the claim, scheduled for a hearing in the English High Court in April 2024. The SFO concluded that the mutual legal assistance process in Lynch’s criminal matter was not confidential. He issued a Part 8 data protection claim against the SFO, requesting every exchange between the agency and the US...
Audi AG v GQ, Case C‑334/22 What are the practical implications of this case? Producing replacement components that feature a recess intended for fitting an OEM trade mark badge can constitute trade mark infringement, within the EU, in certain circumstances. The ramifications for the spare parts sector are extensive, as it may stop them identifying goods by brand references and erode the notion that consumers deserve a choice between genuine and independent spares in an open, competitive internal market across all Member States. The ruling also seems at odds with the AG’s views in matters such as Louboutin ( Cases C‑148/21 and C‑184/21) and gives scant weight to forthcoming EU repair laws. It signals likely challenges in implementing new repair rules and the prospect of additional movements in jurisprudence and regulation once the Repair Directive comes into force in practice across the...
Shivani Mathur v HMRC [2024] UKUT 38 ( TCC) On 23 April 2015, Deutsche Bank AG ( DB) reached a negotiated resolution with the New York State Department of Financial Services concerning manipulation of interbank offered rates. As a consequence, DB was required to end the employment of several individuals. On 30 April 2015, Ms Mathur was dismissed by her employer, DB Group Services ( UK) Limited (the Employer), a company within the DB group (the Termination). Ms Mathur brought Employment Tribunal ( ET) claims against the Employer, DB, and others, alleging: harassment related to sex under the Equality Act 2010 ( Eq A 2010); direct sex discrimination under the Eq A 2010; victimisation under the Eq A 2010; whistleblowing detriments under the Employment Rights Act 1996 ( ERA 1996); and unfair dismissal under the ERA 1996. In May 2016, after a preliminary hearing but ahead of any full hearing, Ms Mathur and the...
South Oxfordshire District Council and another v Fertre [2024] EWHC 112 ( KB) What are the practical implications of this case? It is not uncommon for an appellant to err when completing an appellant’s notice. In this matter, the High Court found that, where there is substantial compliance with the essential requirements, the appeal is properly instituted and the court retains power to rectify the error. Put another way, so long as the core formalities are met in substance, the appeal is validly brought despite a defect. The mistake here was serious and fundamental: the notice identified the wrong respondent. Even so, the two authorities had integrated their arrangements, sharing premises, a housing officer, a legal department and email accounts. The same review officer handled reviews under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996 ( HA 1996) for both authorities and used a single email...
A cohort of twelve, among them AXA XL Syndicate Ltd and Brit UW Ltd, stated in a defence lodged at England’s High Court on 14 February 2024 that they bear no responsibility for the entire amount sought by WRBC Corp Member Ltd ( WRBC). They maintain that some losses fall within the ambit of the reinsurance treaties and that they have remitted approximately US$26.6m in payments to WRBC. However, the defence asserts that these payments exhaust the AXA/ Brit defendants’ portion of the layer 1 limits under the reinsurance treaties. It is further averred that the claimant has no entitlement to the indemnity demanded in respect of the contingency losses and/or the loss settlements. Validus Reinsurance Ltd, also named by WRBC, submitted a separate defence on 14 February 2024......
When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...
This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...
Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...
I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...