Featured documents
R (Greyhound Board of Great Britain Ltd) v Welsh Ministers [2026] EWHC 670 (Admin) What are the practical implications of this case? The ruling reinforces the constitutional divide between the courts and the legislature. It explains that the scheme and framework of the Government of Wales Act 2006 (GWA 2006) embody that separation of powers, and that any judicial attempt to recognise and enforce a common law obligation on Welsh Ministers to consult prior to introducing legislation in the Senedd would trespass upon that boundary. This is not a departure from established principle; case law has already upheld comparable rules for lawmakers in Scotland and at Westminster. However, this is the first express confirmation of the position for Welsh lawmakers, and the first time this dimension of the GWA 2006 has been analysed in such depth. The court examined earlier
The solution arrived through the United Nations Compensation Commission (UNCC), a quasi‑judicial body handling mass claims, created under UN Security Council Resolution 687. By addressing environmental harm—most notably via its ‘F4’ claim class—the UNCC set a seminal benchmark shaping how international law and contemporary arbitral panels allocate financial responsibility for wartime ecological devastation. With present-day wars in areas such as Eastern Europe and the Middle East bringing dam breaches, strikes on chemical facilities, and the burning of farmland, the UNCC’s legacy endures as an essential reference point for states, global investors, and companies engaged in post‑conflict arbitration. The F4 claims: Quantifying the unquantifiable Prior to the 1990s, mechanisms in international law for war reparations overwhelmingly favoured property loss, foregone earnings, and bodily injury. The natural world was commonly treated as a mute, non-compensable victim of armed hostilities...
Understanding the farming business as a business Many farms still use long-standing structures that arose by habit, not strategy. Sole traders, informal partnerships and outdated partnership deeds are common. While once effective, such setups can cause major issues around succession, tax planning and involving the next generation. A corporate team can take a fresh, business-led view of the farm, asking: Who owns the land and other critical assets? Who manages daily operations? Who carries the risk and who enjoys the return? What is the enduring plan for succession? From this review, the team can confirm whether the current setup is fit for purpose or if an alternative — for example an updated partnership agreement, a company, a limited liability partnership, or a blended model — would better meet the family’s aims. Tax efficiency through joined-up advice Tax sits at the centre of most
Most recent News
Original news Inheritance and Trustees’ Powers Act 2014 ( Commencement) Order 2014 LNB News 01/08/2014 57; SI 2014/2039: With effect from 1 October 2014, a spouse or civil partner of someone who dies without leaving a valid will will take the entire intestate estate where there are no issue, and a larger allocation where issue are left. These revisions flow from the commencement of the Inheritance and Trustees’ Powers Act 2014 ( ITPA 2014). What does ITPA 2014 mean for the routine work of wills and probate practitioners? ITPA 2014 takes effect on 1 October 2014. Among the most notable shifts introduced by ITPA 2014 is the overhaul of the intestacy rules in section 46 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 ( AEA 1925). The legislation secures substantially enhanced financial provision for a surviving spouse where a person dies...
Original news Digital TV streaming service found guilty of copyright violations, LNB News 26/06/2014 New York Times, 26 June 2014: The US Supreme Court held that Aereo, a television streaming platform, breached copyright by capturing broadcast signals with miniature aerials and forwarding them to subscribers for payment. The ruling was a significant victory for US broadcast networks, which argued Aereo had used a high-tech method to pilfer their content. What is the state of unauthorised online streaming in the US? The Aereo judgment adds to a global discussion about third parties distributing broadcast programmes, stepping in between broadcasters and viewers. The case turned on whether US copyright law required permission from broadcasters when Aereo picked up their programmes off-air and sent them online to its users. As a general rule, retransmitting a broadcast to the public in a Berne Convention country will infringe the...
Original news Kohler Mira Ltd v Bristan Group Ltd [2014] EWHC 1931 ( IPEC), [2014] All ER ( D) 130 ( Jun). After the Patent County Court (as it then was) found that the defendant had infringed the claimant’s UK unregistered design rights, the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court held that the claimant should receive a sum equivalent to a royalty of 6.7% of the price at which the defendant sold the infringing shower units to its customers. Moreover, exercising its discretion with reference to policy considerations, the court ruled that the defendant could not invoke the defence of innocence under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 233(1), when it was advanced for the first time during the damages inquiry. Briefly, what was the background to this judgment? This ruling concerns a damages inquiry following last year’s liability decision— Kohler Mira Ltd v Bristan Group Ltd...
Original news Windemere Marina Village v Wild [2014] UKUT 0163 ( LC) The landlord of a marina development – a mixed scheme on the banks of Windermere – appealed an LVT determination that replaced the apportionment of service costs payable by tenants of 26 dwellings with the tribunal’s own division, displacing the split previously set by the landlord’s appointed surveyor. Permission to appeal was granted because the question raised a point of principle with potentially wide reach. Under the lease of a dwelling at the marina, the tenant is required to contribute a fair share of service expenses, that share to be fixed by the Lessor’s surveyor for the time being, whose decision is stated to be final and binding. The central issue was whether statute renders void an agreement making the landlord’s surveyor’s assessment of the service charge...
Original news Coventry and others v Lawrence and another [2014] UKSC 13, [2014] All ER ( D) 245 ( Feb) In February 1975, planning permission was issued to build a stadium in rural Suffolk. That consent authorised use for speedway racing and related facilities for a period of ten years, and in 1985 it was thereafter made permanent. Stock car and banger racing began at the stadium in 1984; after a decade of such activity, Mr Waters obtained a certificate of lawfulness of existing use or development. To the rear of the stadium lay a motocross circuit, operated under a temporary personal planning consent, which was later renewed on a permanent footing. In January 2006 the proprietors, Katherine Lawrence and Raymond Shields, took up residence at Fenland, a residential property situated close to the stadium and the track. In 2008 they commenced...
Original news Report: The Personal Insolvency Landscape— A way forward for formal debt relief The Association of Business Recovery Professionals ( R3) has published a paper seeking to restore balance and coherence to the personal insolvency framework in England and Wales. What are the current problems with the personal insolvency regime? At present, the principal shortcomings are: Limits Existing thresholds are out of date. For example, a creditor can still petition for bankruptcy where only £750 is owed. This figure has remained unchanged since 1986—something in the region of £3,000–£5,000 would be more appropriate. Bankruptcy period The default one‑year bankruptcy term is too brief—it should revert to three years, with an early discharge after a year where bankruptcy occurred without personal fault. For the most imprudent cases, there ought to be scope to lengthen the period up to 15...
Popular documents
When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...
This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...
Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...
I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...
Discover more from LexisNexis
