Legal News

Stay up to date with the legal news that matters, curated by our experts
GET A TRIAL

Featured documents

PUBLIC LAW

R (Greyhound Board of Great Britain Ltd) v Welsh Ministers [2026] EWHC 670 (Admin) What are the practical implications of this case? The ruling reinforces the constitutional divide between the courts and the legislature. It explains that the scheme and framework of the Government of Wales Act 2006 (GWA 2006) embody that separation of powers, and that any judicial attempt to recognise and enforce a common law obligation on Welsh Ministers to consult prior to introducing legislation in the Senedd would trespass upon that boundary. This is not a departure from established principle; case law has already upheld comparable rules for lawmakers in Scotland and at Westminster. However, this is the first express confirmation of the position for Welsh lawmakers, and the first time this dimension of the GWA 2006 has been analysed in such depth. The court examined earlier

Read More Right Arrow
ARBITRATION

The solution arrived through the United Nations Compensation Commission (UNCC), a quasi‑judicial body handling mass claims, created under UN Security Council Resolution 687. By addressing environmental harm—most notably via its ‘F4’ claim class—the UNCC set a seminal benchmark shaping how international law and contemporary arbitral panels allocate financial responsibility for wartime ecological devastation. With present-day wars in areas such as Eastern Europe and the Middle East bringing dam breaches, strikes on chemical facilities, and the burning of farmland, the UNCC’s legacy endures as an essential reference point for states, global investors, and companies engaged in post‑conflict arbitration. The F4 claims: Quantifying the unquantifiable Prior to the 1990s, mechanisms in international law for war reparations overwhelmingly favoured property loss, foregone earnings, and bodily injury. The natural world was commonly treated as a mute, non-compensable victim of armed hostilities...

Read More Right Arrow
PRIVATE CLIENT

Understanding the farming business as a business Many farms still use long-standing structures that arose by habit, not strategy. Sole traders, informal partnerships and outdated partnership deeds are common. While once effective, such setups can cause major issues around succession, tax planning and involving the next generation. A corporate team can take a fresh, business-led view of the farm, asking: Who owns the land and other critical assets? Who manages daily operations? Who carries the risk and who enjoys the return? What is the enduring plan for succession? From this review, the team can confirm whether the current setup is fit for purpose or if an alternative — for example an updated partnership agreement, a company, a limited liability partnership, or a blended model — would better meet the family’s aims. Tax efficiency through joined-up advice Tax sits at the centre of most

Read More Right Arrow

Most recent News

Clear all filter
NEWS

Financial services developments CRAs: FCA publishes multi-firm review on rating committees The Financial Conduct Authority ( FCA) has issued a multi-firm review assessing the effectiveness and governance of rating committees within UK-registered credit rating agencies ( CRAs). It highlights sound practices and areas requiring enhancement across committee governance, the make-up and duties of members, committee operations, and the robustness of internal controls that manage conflicts of interest and safeguard the independence of credit ratings. The review does not set new expectations but helps firms interpret existing ones. UK-registered CRAs should consider the findings, review their rating committee procedures and practices, and confirm that internal control frameworks are effective. In line with the FCA’s 2024 portfolio letter, the FCA expects CRAs to sustain rigorous, end-to-end ratings processes. The FCA intends to continue engaging with firms to evaluate how well rating committee internal controls perform. It will also...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

R (on the application of Oceana UK) v Secretary of State for Energy Security and others [2025] EWHC 2984 ( Admin) What was the background? The dispute stemmed from a judicial review issued by Oceana UK against the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Climate Change, challenging three ‘appropriate assessments’ undertaken at the licensing phase of the 33rd Seaward Oil and Gas Licensing Round. Those assessments were intended to fulfil the Secretary of State’s obligations under regulation 5(1) of the Offshore Petroleum Activities ( Conservation of Habitats) Regulations 2001 (the 2001 Regulations). The 2001 regime gives offshore effect to the Habitats Directive in a manner closely akin to the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 that govern onshore planning decisions. Oceana contended that the licensing-stage assessments did not satisfy the precautionary requirement for ‘complete, precise and definitive’ conclusions, because...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Executor of Goudman- Peachey v HMRC [2025] UKFTT 1402 ( TC) The taxpayer and her late husband acquired a rural estate for around £8 million. Although the holding comprised nine distinct Land Registry titles, the acquisition proceeded as a single deal. The estate included a principal house, two ancillary dwellings, a swimming pool and equestrian amenities, plus 150 acres used in part for deer and other animal grazing. The vendors had operated the property as an equestrian facility, for sheep grazing and as a commercial deer park, with a portion of land let to a farmer for maize cultivation. Two days before the transaction, the taxpayer entered into an agreement to buy the 130 deer on the estate and for the existing manager to continue......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

EU financial services developments ESMA to assess conflicts of interest in the distribution of financial instruments The European Securities and Markets Authority ( ESMA) has stated that in 2026 it plans to initiate a common supervisory action ( CSA) alongside the national competent authorities ( NCAs), targeting conflicts of interest within the distribution of financial instruments. This CSA will examine firms’ adherence to their Mi FID II duties to recognise, avert, and handle conflicts of interest when presenting investment products to retail clients......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Staffordshire County Council v Jake’s Grandmother and others [2025] EWHC 2230 ( Fam) What are the practical implications of this case? The practical implications arising from this case are: a reaffirmation that the court’s ability to invoke its inherent parens patriae jurisdiction is constrained by Ch A 1989, s 100(3)–(5). In this matter, Ch A 1989, s 100(4)(b) was triggered and the LA failed to show that J was at risk of harm if the court did not deploy its inherent jurisdiction confirmation of the court’s hesitancy to make an Order where another specialist body is already engaged ......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Perrin v Walsh [2025] EWHC 2536 ( KB) What are the practical implications of this case? Where there is proof of egregious behaviour by operatives, the court may decide to exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible and probative. Defendants intending to rely on covert surveillance must take particular care to ensure that: all — meaning every last piece — of the surveillance material is disclosed any edited compilation still contains all footage that is relevant where the operative possesses relevant, unique knowledge, they provide commentary to supply proper context to what the footage shows witness evidence is served that accurately sets out the circumstances of all surveillance, explains how or why any gaps arose, and describes the systems used to secure fair capture and appropriate backup Care should be taken to avoid an expert referring to another expert’s earlier draft...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Costs of unsuccessful claimant ordered against defendants for failed allegation of fundamental dishonesty ( Hakmi v East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust & another) Hakmi v East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust & another [2025] EWHC 2597 ( KB) What are the practical implications of this case? Defendants and those acting for them should pause before pleading and persisting with a charge of fundamental dishonesty. This ruling underlines that the appropriate costs order turns not solely on the result of the litigation, but equally on the route taken to get there. Bolting on a weak allegation of fundamental dishonesty is to be shunned; otherwise defendants may find themselves liable for uplifted costs where the claimant prevails, and, exposed to adverse costs even where the claimant does not succeed. What was the background? The proceedings stem from an alleged omission to administer thrombolysis for a stroke, which the...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Antitrust Court of Justice issues judgment concerning national reference from the Netherlands confirming courts have jurisdiction over representative antitrust actions against apple regarding the App Store The Court of Justice has delivered its ruling in Case C‑34/24, Stitching Right to Consumer Justice and Stitching App Stores Claims, a Dutch reference seeking guidance on jurisdiction in a damages claim against Apple for alleged breaches of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. The Court rejected Apple’s jurisdictional objections, confirming the Netherlands courts may hear the representative antitrust actions in full... Background Apple runs the i OS ecosystem, where the App Store—pre‑installed on all Apple devices since 2009—acts as the sole channel for developers to distribute apps to i Phone and i Pad users. An Apple ID is required, app availability differs by country, and Dutch‑configured Apple IDs are directed to the...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

DNA plans DNA plans face a coordinated pushback from six Member States, which are pressing the Commission to drop its bid for a fully harmonised telecoms regime and to recast the overhaul as a directive, a joint text dated 26 November 2025 and seen by MLex shows. While a regulation has direct and uniform effect across all EU countries, a directive sets targets that countries must meet but allows them to decide how to implement the rules. The paper was submitted by: Austria France Germany Hungary Italy Slovenia They argue that Europe’s telecom markets remain marked by significant differences, requiring the legal flexibility that only a directive can deliver. A regulation, they warn, would bypass national implementation and impose uniform obligations with no room to reflect long-standing domestic frameworks, especially in sensitive areas such as lawful...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Antitrust Ofgem publishes decision to accept binding commitments from Scotia Gas Networks to resolve abuse of dominance concerns Ofgem has confirmed it will accept binding commitments offered by Scotia Gas Networks ( SGN) under section 31A of the Competition Act 1998, following concerns that SGN had exploited a dominant position within SGN Gas Distribution Network by declining to adopt higher-pressure (above 7 barg) third-party gas connections and by imposing non-uniform conditions on equivalent transactions, thereby excluding competitors. This published decision was intended to address abuse of dominance concerns identified by the regulator and resolve them......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Financial services developments FCA consults on ESG rating transparency and governance proposals The Financial Conduct Authority ( FCA) has released consultation paper CP25/34, ESG ratings: proposed approach to regulation, outlining measures intended to make environmental, social and governance ( ESG) ratings transparent, dependable and comparable. These plans stem from the government’s move to place ESG ratings within the FCA’s scope. Feedback is requested by 31 March 2026. FCA research indicates about half of users of ESG ratings have concerns about construction (55%) and the level of transparency (48%). To tackle this, the consultation concentrates on four themes: Greater transparency to support easier like-for-like assessment for both users of ratings and rated entities Stronger governance, systems and controls to secure clear decision-making, robust oversight and quality assurance Detecting and managing conflicts of interest Clear expectations around stakeholder engagement and complaints handling It also proposes how existing FCA...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

HMRC v Michael Breen [2025] UKFTT 1415 ( TC) Ordinarily, at the FTT each party bears its own costs as a general rule, usually. There are, however, exceptions to that default position, for instance where a party acts 'unreasonably in bringing, defending or conducting proceedings' ( FTT Rules, SI 2009/273, rule 10(1)(b)). In this matter, the taxpayer, Mr Breen, failed to engage with the enquiry and, after lodging his appeal, with the FTT process. That extended to non-compliance with case management directions (the Directions) as well as two Unless Orders. Consequently, his appeal was automatically struck out in November 2020. His bid to have the proceedings reinstated succeeded in the FTT. But HMRC overturned that reinstatement at the Upper Tribunal ( UT) in 2023 (the UT Decision). The UT concluded there had been 'serious and significant' breaches with no...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Guidance on Public Sector Exit Payments: Use of Special Severance Payments ( Nov 2025) What does the guidance do The HMT ‘ Guidance on Public Sector Exit Payments: Use of Special Severance Payments’: outlines the factors employers must weigh before agreeing any special severance payment describes the approvals needed to authorise such payments, including the relevant delegated thresholds details the expectations on transparency and reporting adds to the special severance material in HMT’s Managing Public Money, Annex 4.13 For more information, see Practice Note: Dismissing a senior executive— Public sector employees. What are the practical implications of the guidance update Special severance payments are sums paid on ending employment that do not align with any existing contractual, statutory or other legal entitlement. The kinds of payments captured will depend on an employee’s particular circumstances. Where the employer contests, in whole or in part, an...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

As we outlined in our recent piece, employees are increasingly relying on generative AI tools to compose lengthy, sometimes legalistic, grievances. Unsurprisingly, this technology has seeped into the Tribunal process too, with pleadings, witness statements and correspondence now often bearing a distinct AI aroma. Why does this matter and what must the parties do about it? Those familiar traces are increasingly apparent across submissions and further correspondence between parties. Why does AI involvement matter? It is widely accepted that generative AI is prone to overstatement and even outright invention (hallucinations, for those who favour the jargon). Though risky everywhere, its deployment in litigation creates specific worries: accuracy: Given AI’s tendency to hallucinate, has it produced incorrect material? credibility: Is a statement attributed to a witness, but drafted by AI, genuinely in that witness’s own language? If someone has relied heavily on AI to...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Brambles Administration Ltd and others v Harvey and others [2025] EWHC 2980 ( Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision serves as a prompt on when it is justified to incur the cost of appealing a Pensions Ombudsman determination. An appeal lies only on a point of law under section 151(4) of the Pension Schemes Act 1993, and is not a vehicle to revisit the Ombudsman’s factual conclusions unless there has been an ‘ Improper Decision’: (i) a conclusion not open on the evidence or one that is perverse, (ii) a failure to consider relevant matters, or (iii) taking account of irrelevant matters. It also underscores the need to air all factual contentions fully before the Ombudsman, rather than attempting to advance them on appeal. The judgment further indicates the courts’ reluctance to allow trustees to rely on...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

EU financial services developments SRB announces planned consultations for 2026 The Single Resolution Board ( SRB) has issued its 2026 schedule of industry consultations and requests. It sets out anticipated consultations, data collections and deliverables arising from EU legal acts, the SRB Expectations for Banks ( Ef B), and the SRB’s continued move towards bank-led testing and resolvability assessment. The table of specific requests outlines every element that could be sought from banks in 2026. Institutions have already been alerted through priority letters where particular items apply to them, meaning that, in most cases, each bank has been given a more streamlined list of obligations than the broader overview presented in the table. Source: SRB publishes the list of consultations and requests to the industry for 2026. EU news and guidance are available in the EU Law Practice Area. For more...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Antitrust Government publishes response to its consultation regarding the draft amendment to the Competition Act 1998 ( Public Transport Ticketing Schemes Block Exemption) Order 2021 The Department for Business and Trade ( DBT) has issued the government’s reply to its July 2025 consultation on the draft Competition Act 1998 ( Public Transport Ticketing Schemes Block Exemption) ( Amendment) Order 2025. These proposed changes reflect the CMA’s January 2025 advice to refresh and extend the 2021 Block Exemption, which is scheduled to lapse on 28 February 2026......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

Mergers The Commission approved: New Princes S.p. A. to take sole control of Carrefour Italia S.p. A. ( M.12121), following a phase I investigation—see Midday Express for further details Global Payments Inc. to acquire joint control of Erste Card d.o.o. ......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

EU financial services developments SRB announces planned consultations for 2026 The Single Resolution Board ( SRB) has issued its catalogue of consultations and industry requests for 2026. It details anticipated consultations, data calls and deliverables arising from EU legal instruments, the SRB Expectations for Banks ( Ef B), and the SRB’s continued pivot towards bank-led testing and resolvability reviews. A table of specific requests sets out every element that could potentially be sought from banks in 2026. Institutions have already been advised via their priority letters where any of these obligations apply to them individually. As a result, in most cases banks have received a requirements list that is slimmer and more targeted than the high-level overview in the table. Source: SRB publishes the list of consultations and requests to the industry for 2026. EU news and guidance are available in the EU Law...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS

On 27 November 2025, the government issued four linked publications explaining how the new local plan-making system will work under the LURA 2023... Create or update a local plan using the new system — a new collection acting as the central hub for the regime, assembling draft guidance, templates and links to supporting material 30-month local plan process: an overview — draft guidance setting out the mandatory 30-month timetable and the principal steps from notice through to adoption Rollout of the new local plan-making system – guidance — clarifies how and when the new system will commence, the transition from the legacy 2012 Regulations regime, and the backstop dates for plan preparation Plan-making regulations explainer — a detailed summary of what forthcoming secondary legislation will require procedurally, including new consultation, timetable and Gateway duties All four were published together to give local...

Read More Right Arrow

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow

Discover more from LexisNexis