Legal Checklists

Service out of the jurisdiction—the general position In numerous situations, the court’s permission is needed to lawfully serve insolvency proceedings outside the jurisdiction of England and Wales. For further reading and detail, see Practice Note: Service of insolvency proceedings out of the jurisdiction. Requests for permission to effect service of insolvency proceedings beyond the jurisdiction are governed by, in particular, the Insolvency ( England and Wales) Rules 2016 ( IR 2016), SI 2016/1024, Sch 4, para 1(8), together with selected provisions of CPR 6 and the Practice Direction on Insolvency Proceedings ( PDIP). When must service out of the jurisdiction be with court permission? As a general rule, the court’s permission is ordinarily required in order for documents connected to insolvency proceedings (including applications, supporting evidence and orders) to be validly served on a party situated outside the jurisdiction. IR 2016, SI 2016/1024, Sch 4, para 1(8)...

Checklist This Checklist outlines a non-exhaustive set of points to review when bringing a possession claim after a lease has expired, and for enforcing any order then secured......

Introduce yourself to the officer and ensure you make a note of their name and rank. Set out for the officer the consultation’s purpose and your expectations clearly. Make sure these points are addressed during the consultation: Review the officer’s case account, whether given orally or in writing. If arrested, verify why and how the client was detained, especially noting the place and time at which arrest occurred......

This Checklist Sets out the actions practitioners must take to secure a witness summons compelling a witness to attend a Crown Court criminal trial in England and Wales, under the Criminal Procedure ( Attendance of Witnesses) Act 1965 ( CP( AW) A 1965) and in line with the Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 ( Crim PR 2025), SI 2025/909, Pt 17. It should be noted that equivalent powers to issue a summons for a proposed witness in a magistrates’ court are provided by section 97 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, and powers exist to compel the production of a witness deposition for admission in a Crown Court trial under Schedule 3 to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. For additional guidance on these powers, consult Practice Note: Obtaining third-party disclosure in criminal proceedings......

This Checklist sets out the obligations for local authorities seeking approval to deploy surveillance powers under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 ( RIPA 2000) and the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ( IPA 2016). It should be read alongside Practice Notes: Regulation of investigatory powers under RIPA 2000 and The regulation of intelligence gathering—an introductory guide. RIPA 2000 requirements Under RIPA 2000, the requirements include: advance authorisation for directed surveillance a prohibition on the authority conducting intrusive surveillance authorising the conduct and use of a covert human intelligence source ( CHIS) safeguards governing the conduct and use of a CHIS authorisation to acquire communications data obtaining judicial approval for those authorisations Authorisation and judicial approval for the acquisition of communications data are now governed by IPA 2016. See Practice Notes: Surveillance powers of local...

This is a Checklist of the main issues that an employer will need to consider when seeking a medical report on a prospective employee during the recruitment process: For what reason is the report required? Refer to Practice Note: Medical reports—data protection issues and AMRA 1988— Purposes of medical report Why must health details be collected, and what grounds justify requesting a medical report—is there a particular aspect of the post that demands it, or is it to gauge overall fitness for a challenging senior position? What scope should the report have—what does the prospective employer actually need to know, steering clear of intrusion where it is unnecessary or irrelevant? Could the employer limit the health data it handles by engaging an occupational health ( OH) service or specialist? Who will have access to the report, at what stage, and for what...

This is a Checklist of the main issues that an employer will need to consider when seeking a medical report on a current employee during the employee’s employment: Clarify the objective of the report clearly. See Practice Note: Medical reports—data protection issues and AMRA 1988— Purposes of medical report. Explain why health information is required and set out the grounds for requesting a medical report—is there a defined element of the role that necessitates it, or is the aim to evaluate overall health, eg for a physically demanding post? Set the scope of the report—identify precisely what the employer needs to know, avoiding intrusion where it is not needed or relevant. Consider whether involving an occupational health ( OH) professional or service could limit the volume of health data the employer processes. Specify who will have sight of the...

This Checklist outlines the principal steps a creditor should take to secure and execute a charging order against land, with clear pointers to fuller guidance provided at each stage. Preliminary considerations Confirm there is an appropriate judgment debt, verify the debtor holds an interest in land, and also weigh any other practical matters. See Practice Notes: Charging orders and orders for sale—practical considerations Charging orders—what are they and when to use them— CPR 73 Application Decide if the application has to be filed with the Civil National Business Centre. See: Charging orders—is this a CNBC or non- CNBC case?—flowchart......

For trustees and managers of occupational pension schemes: Confirm that the scheme’s provisions, criteria and practices ( PCPs) have been examined and reviewed to verify compliance with the non-discrimination rule. Where a PCP seems prima facie discriminatory and appears not to fit an exemption, raise with employer the question of whether an objective justification can be demonstrated. Understand how both courts and tribunals typically assess the objective justification defence in general. Do not treat generalisations or stereotyped assumptions as an adequate answer or satisfactory explanation......

When drafting or negotiating a deed of novation in the context of a design and build construction project where a consultant is being novated from the employer to the contractor (see Practice Note: Novation in construction projects), the following should be taken into account: Consideration Confirm that the novation is supported by consideration. If it is absent, or its existence is uncertain, the novation should be executed as a deed. Underlying agreement The deed of novation should identify the original appointment under which the consultant was engaged, together with a concise summary of the services they were retained to provide. Declaration of novation The deed should record (typically in the recitals) that the consultant and the former employer have agreed to transfer the underlying agreement to the new employer (that is, the contractor) on the terms contained in the deed of...

This Checklist sets out the principal jurisdictional aspects of the UK merger control regime and provides practical direction for assessing whether to voluntarily notify a transaction to the Competition and Markets Authority ( CMA), or alternatively, whether a tactical decision might be to proceed without notification in the hope of ‘flying under the radar’. Characteristics of the UK merger control system The merger control system of the UK diverges from most other jurisdictions in a number of respects: the UK’s merger control regime is voluntary by virtue of its non-suspensory nature......

Why apply for a Norwich Pharmacal Order? A Norwich Pharmacal Order ( NPO) is an effective means of obtaining information that would not otherwise be accessible, enabling a party to commence and advance a claim, particularly to reveal the identity of a likely defendant. Where a third party holds details about a prospective defendant and has become involved in the alleged misconduct (though typically without personal liability), the court, exercising its equitable jurisdiction, may order that third party to disclose the information via an NPO... For more on the court’s jurisdiction to grant an NPO, consult Practice Notes: Norwich Pharmacal orders ( NPOs) and Norwich Pharmacal orders—making an application. When working through the Checklist, the third column can be used to note observations or comments as each stage is...

FORTHCOMING DEVELOPMENT: Section 10 of the Finance Act 2022 will raise the normal minimum pension age ( NMPA) from 55 to 57 on 6 April 2028, except for members of the public service pension schemes for firefighters, police and the armed forces. The Finance Act 2022 will also permit members of registered pension schemes to take benefits before 57 if, on or before 4 November 2021, they met certain conditions: they already had an ‘unqualified right’ to take benefits; or they were in the course of a substantive transfer to a scheme providing an unqualified right to a protected pension age below 57 on or before that date. To rely on this new 2028 protection, the scheme’s rules must have included, as at 11 February 2021, an unqualified right to access scheme benefits before age 57. For further...

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is archived and is no longer maintained. A bank loan is treated as a non-performing loan ( NPL) if more than 90 days pass without the borrower making the agreed instalments or interest payments. Banks experienced an accumulation of NPLs in their books when borrowers' inability to repay was intensified by the financial crisis and subsequent recessions. When NPLs are proportionately high, banks' capacity to manage the riskiness of their lending is diminished. NPLs are a supervisory priority for the European Central Bank ( ECB), which monitors the overall level of NPLs across euro area banks. Under the supervisory review and evaluation process ( SREP), the ECB assesses whether individual banks adequately manage loan risk and whether they have suitable strategies, governance arrangements and processes in place. The ECB also regularly undertakes co-ordinated exercises to review the asset quality of the banks it...

This Checklist summarises the UK Corporate Governance Code requirements relating to the composition of the nomination committee of quoted companies together with best practice guidelines of major institutional investor representative bodies UK Corporate Governance Code ( UKCG Code) Most members of the nomination committee should be independent non-executive directors. The company chair should not preside over the nomination committee when it is considering the appointment of their successor. Reference: 2018 UKCG Code, Provision 17; 2024 UKCG Code, Provision 17 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc ( ISS) A majority of the nomination committee should comprise independent non-executive directors. No fewer than half of the committee’s members should be independent. For AIM-listed companies, and other quoted companies outside the FTSE 350, FTSE Small Cap and FTSE Fledgling indices, at least half of the nomination committee should be...

ARCHIVED This Checklist is archived and is not maintained or updated. It considers how UK courts would apply Regulation ( EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast)—which concerns the allocation of court jurisdiction for civil and commercial matters—if the UK were to leave the EU on exit day without a deal, the so‑called ‘no deal Brexit’ scenario. ‘ Exit day’ has the meaning given by section 20 of the European Union ( Withdrawal) Act 2018. The Checklist reviews the Regulation’s jurisdictional articles and evaluates whether the UK courts will apply them and, if so, in what way. The outcome varies depending on whether proceedings are started before exit day (with the jurisdictional issue decided afterwards) or initiated after exit day. The principal UK instrument is the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments ( Amendment) ( EU Exit) Regulations 2019, SI 2019/479. Coming into force on exit day, it...

ARCHIVED : This Checklist has been archived and is not maintained. This Checklist assesses the stance EU courts are anticipated to take in relation to the application of Regulation ( EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast), should the UK leave the EU on exit day without an agreement, the so‑called ‘no deal Brexit’ scenario. In particular, it considers and reviews the Regulation’s articles that address jurisdiction, together with the effects of a no deal Brexit on their practical application in proceedings featuring a UK element (whether involving a defendant domiciled in the UK, a jurisdiction agreement in favour of a UK court, or parallel or related proceedings brought before the UK courts). The position differs depending on whether proceedings were commenced prior to exit day (with the jurisdictional dispute to be determined after that date) or whether the proceedings were instituted after exit day......

ARCHIVED : This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. A range of jurisdictional regimes dictates whether a court may hear a dispute. This Checklist reviews the anticipated impact of Brexit on how different courts apply those rules when determining the effect of a particular jurisdiction agreement (also referred to as a choice of court agreement) after exit day. The rules examined are: Regulation ( EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) Lugano Convention 2007 Brussels Convention Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements national laws It does not address Regulation ( EC) 44/2001, Brussels I since, with the passage of time, it is unlikely to be relevant for determining jurisdiction. Nor does it cover specialist conventions dealing with jurisdiction, such as the United Nations Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea ( Hamburg rules). The Checklist assesses any change (if any) in the application of these rules as a...

Checklist This Checklist outlines practical actions for your first week in a new role as an in-house lawyer. It highlights relevant Precedents you can use or adapt to support these steps. There is space for you to note whether you have completed each action and to include comments. Use the section provided to tick off actions and add observations. It should be read together with Practice Note: Finding your feet in-house—your first week. Day 1 Your first day will be dominated by practicalities. Begin by considering your own needs, eg your health, safety and security, your contract, travel to the office, and office access: Practical step: ☐ Meet with your line manager Further details: Keep this meeting fairly informal, but flag the need to arrange a more structured session soon—perhaps in your second week with the...

A meeting with your line manager on your first day Setting up a meeting with your line manager on day one of your new role is strongly advisable. Although it will most likely be an initial ‘getting to know you’ chat, there are several questions you can raise to help you feel more at ease in the position. If you are the only in-house lawyer or leading an internal legal team, your line manager will typically be the CEO or Finance Director, though it could be any other director. If you are joining an existing team, your line manager may sit in a legal, regulatory or compliance function, for example: Company Secretary General Counsel Senior Solicitor Legal Director Compliance Director Alternatively, they may hold a non-legal post, such as Finance Director or CEO. In a larger team with multiple layers in the...